[ENet-discuss] ENet-discuss Digest, Vol 56, Issue 6

[GUAN ZHI]

Thank you m8s, I downloaded enet 1.1 but I found in the enet.h, the
defininition of the version is still:

typedef enum
{
   ENET_VERSION = 1
} ENetVersion;

Isn't that means it's version 1.0 actually?


On 1/12/08, enet-discuss-request at cubik.org <enet-discuss-request at cubik.org>
wrote:
>
> Send ENet-discuss mailing list submissions to
>        enet-discuss at cubik.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        enet-discuss-request at cubik.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        enet-discuss-owner at cubik.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ENet-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1.  Different enet versions of server and client (GUAN ZHI)
>   2. Re:  Different enet versions of server and client (Lee Salzman)
>   3. Re:  Different enet versions of server and client
>      (Martin Sherburn)
>   4. Re:  Different enet versions of server and client (Lee Salzman)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:43:14 +0800
> From: "GUAN ZHI" <toppopgames at gmail.com>
> Subject: [ENet-discuss] Different enet versions of server and client
> To: enet-discuss at cubik.org
> Message-ID:
>        <b7755b160801110243t769665bdq9faf0d168fc66c52 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi, all,  I have a question, If I use enet 1.1 for the server however the
> client keeps 1.0, will it lead to any mistake?  thanks
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20080111/9159e337/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:40:52 -0800
> From: Lee Salzman <lsalzman1 at cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Different enet versions of server and
>        client
> To: Discussion of the ENet library <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
> Message-ID: <4786E544.8000407 at cox.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> The protocols used in different point releases are incompatible. I am
> roughly going by this scheme:
>
> Version numbers are X.Y.Z
>
> If X is different, then the API and/or internals have radically altered
> beyond all hope of compatibility.
> If Y is different, the API is roughly the same, but the protocol is not
> compatible.
> If Z is different, then only bug-fixes and minor changes have occurred,
> but the protocol has not changed at all and should still be compatible.
>
> Lee
>
> GUAN ZHI wrote:
> > Hi, all,  I have a question, If I use enet 1.1 for the server however
> > the client keeps 1.0, will it lead to any mistake?  thanks
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:35:01 +0000
> From: Martin Sherburn <spacedude at konggame.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Different enet versions of server and
>        client
> To: Discussion of the ENet library <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
> Message-ID: <47875465.5030300 at konggame.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I beleive the two are not compatible because of same changes to the
> packet headers. So basically it won't work, enet 1.1 cannot communicate
> with enet 1.0
> (http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/2007-May/000677.html).
>
> I have a related question of my own though, there was some talk about
> enet 1.2 a while ago. Will this version also break compatibility or not?
> I'm hoping not...
>
> Martin.
>
> GUAN ZHI wrote:
> > Hi, all,  I have a question, If I use enet 1.1 for the server however
> > the client keeps 1.0, will it lead to any mistake?  thanks
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ENet-discuss mailing list
> > ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
> >
>
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment
> may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer
> system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:32:59 -0800
> From: Lee Salzman <lsalzman1 at cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Different enet versions of server and
>        client
> To: Discussion of the ENet library <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
> Message-ID: <4786F17B.8000600 at cox.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> ENet 1.2 (what is basically CVS at the moment) basically is not compatible
> with ENet 1.1. It is "superficially" protocol compatible in that
> connections might
> work for a few moments, then disconnect/timeout at odd moments if you
> connect
> a 1.2 peer with a 1.1 peer.
>
> Lee
>
> Martin Sherburn wrote:
> > I beleive the two are not compatible because of same changes to the
> > packet headers. So basically it won't work, enet 1.1 cannot communicate
> > with enet 1.0
> > (http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/2007-May/000677.html).
> >
> > I have a related question of my own though, there was some talk about
> > enet 1.2 a while ago. Will this version also break compatibility or not?
> > I'm hoping not...
> >
> > Martin.
> >
> > GUAN ZHI wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, all,  I have a question, If I use enet 1.1 for the server however
> >> the client keeps 1.0, will it lead to any mistake?  thanks
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
> End of ENet-discuss Digest, Vol 56, Issue 6
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20080112/75fcd59e/attachment.htm