<div>Thank you m8s, I downloaded enet 1.1 but I found in the enet.h, the defininition of the version is still:<br><br>typedef enum<br>{<br> ENET_VERSION = 1<br>} ENetVersion;<br><br>Isn't that means it's version
1.0 actually?<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/12/08, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:enet-discuss-request@cubik.org">enet-discuss-request@cubik.org</a></b> <<a href="mailto:enet-discuss-request@cubik.org">enet-discuss-request@cubik.org
</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Send ENet-discuss mailing list submissions to<br> <a href="mailto:enet-discuss@cubik.org">enet-discuss@cubik.org
</a><br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> <a href="http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss">http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss</a><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
<br> <a href="mailto:enet-discuss-request@cubik.org">enet-discuss-request@cubik.org</a><br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> <a href="mailto:enet-discuss-owner@cubik.org">enet-discuss-owner@cubik.org
</a><br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents of ENet-discuss digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Different enet versions of server and client (GUAN ZHI)
<br> 2. Re: Different enet versions of server and client (Lee Salzman)<br> 3. Re: Different enet versions of server and client<br> (Martin Sherburn)<br> 4. Re: Different enet versions of server and client (Lee Salzman)
<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:43:14 +0800<br>From: "GUAN ZHI" <<a href="mailto:toppopgames@gmail.com">toppopgames@gmail.com
</a>><br>Subject: [ENet-discuss] Different enet versions of server and client<br>To: <a href="mailto:enet-discuss@cubik.org">enet-discuss@cubik.org</a><br>Message-ID:<br> <<a href="mailto:b7755b160801110243t769665bdq9faf0d168fc66c52@mail.gmail.com">
b7755b160801110243t769665bdq9faf0d168fc66c52@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Hi, all, I have a question, If I use enet 1.1 for the server however the<br>client keeps
1.0, will it lead to any mistake? thanks<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <a href="http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20080111/9159e337/attachment.html">
http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20080111/9159e337/attachment.html</a><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:40:52 -0800<br>From: Lee Salzman <<a href="mailto:lsalzman1@cox.net">
lsalzman1@cox.net</a>><br>Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Different enet versions of server and<br> client<br>To: Discussion of the ENet library <<a href="mailto:enet-discuss@cubik.org">enet-discuss@cubik.org</a>>
<br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4786E544.8000407@cox.net">4786E544.8000407@cox.net</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>The protocols used in different point releases are incompatible. I am
<br>roughly going by this scheme:<br><br>Version numbers are X.Y.Z<br><br>If X is different, then the API and/or internals have radically altered<br>beyond all hope of compatibility.<br>If Y is different, the API is roughly the same, but the protocol is not
<br>compatible.<br>If Z is different, then only bug-fixes and minor changes have occurred,<br>but the protocol has not changed at all and should still be compatible.<br><br>Lee<br><br>GUAN ZHI wrote:<br>> Hi, all, I have a question, If I use enet
1.1 for the server however<br>> the client keeps 1.0, will it lead to any mistake? thanks<br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 3<br>Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:35:01 +0000<br>From: Martin Sherburn <
<a href="mailto:spacedude@konggame.co.uk">spacedude@konggame.co.uk</a>><br>Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Different enet versions of server and<br> client<br>To: Discussion of the ENet library <<a href="mailto:enet-discuss@cubik.org">
enet-discuss@cubik.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:47875465.5030300@konggame.co.uk">47875465.5030300@konggame.co.uk</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>I beleive the two are not compatible because of same changes to the
<br>packet headers. So basically it won't work, enet 1.1 cannot communicate<br>with enet 1.0<br>(<a href="http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/2007-May/000677.html">http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/2007-May/000677.html
</a>).<br><br>I have a related question of my own though, there was some talk about<br>enet 1.2 a while ago. Will this version also break compatibility or not?<br>I'm hoping not...<br><br>Martin.<br><br>GUAN ZHI wrote:
<br>> Hi, all, I have a question, If I use enet 1.1 for the server however<br>> the client keeps 1.0, will it lead to any mistake? thanks<br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> ENet-discuss mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:ENet-discuss@cubik.org">ENet-discuss@cubik.org</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss">
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss</a><br>><br><br><br>This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment<br>may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
<br>you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the<br>University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 4<br>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:32:59 -0800<br>From: Lee Salzman <<a href="mailto:lsalzman1@cox.net">lsalzman1@cox.net</a>><br>Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Different enet versions of server and<br> client<br>To: Discussion of the ENet library <
<a href="mailto:enet-discuss@cubik.org">enet-discuss@cubik.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4786F17B.8000600@cox.net">4786F17B.8000600@cox.net</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
<br><br>ENet 1.2 (what is basically CVS at the moment) basically is not compatible<br>with ENet 1.1. It is "superficially" protocol compatible in that<br>connections might<br>work for a few moments, then disconnect/timeout at odd moments if you
<br>connect<br>a 1.2 peer with a 1.1 peer.<br><br>Lee<br><br>Martin Sherburn wrote:<br>> I beleive the two are not compatible because of same changes to the<br>> packet headers. So basically it won't work, enet
1.1 cannot communicate<br>> with enet 1.0<br>> (<a href="http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/2007-May/000677.html">http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/2007-May/000677.html</a>).<br>><br>> I have a related question of my own though, there was some talk about
<br>> enet 1.2 a while ago. Will this version also break compatibility or not?<br>> I'm hoping not...<br>><br>> Martin.<br>><br>> GUAN ZHI wrote:<br>><br>>> Hi, all, I have a question, If I use enet
1.1 for the server however<br>>> the client keeps 1.0, will it lead to any mistake? thanks<br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>ENet-discuss mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:ENet-discuss@cubik.org">ENet-discuss@cubik.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss">http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss</a><br><br><br>End of ENet-discuss Digest, Vol 56, Issue 6
<br>*******************************************<br></blockquote></div><br>