[ENet-discuss] Bandwidth throttling?

[Pablo de Heras Ciechomski]

Is there a way to do that in ENet to send reliable packets to individual
peers such that the packets do not "block" all outgoing reliable packets to
other peers? Or is it rather that I filled up some maximum buffer size of
reliable data that can exist at the same time?

That I still have not understood.

Pablo

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Pablo de Heras Ciechomski <
pablo.deheras at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yet again I win the Internet...
>
> So I answer my own question. Indeed as I feared when larger packets than
> the MTU are sent, they are sent reliably. Arghhhhhh...
>
> ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNRELIABLE_FRAGMENT : packet will be fragmented using
> unreliable (instead of reliable) sends if it exceeds the MTU
>
> Sorry for the signal to noise distortion :-)
>
> Pablo
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Pablo de Heras Ciechomski <
> pablo.deheras at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is it because I should allow fragmentation too? Meaning that if I don't
>> allow fragmentation a packet that has not yet arrived will stall the
>> others? All packets are sent unreliable.
>>
>> So confused now,
>>
>> Pablo
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Pablo de Heras Ciechomski <
>> pablo.deheras at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Lee, hello all,
>>>
>>> I have a streaming server where I have a rather high outgoing bandwidth
>>> (14Mbit) and I set the server and client to 0 limit that is unlimited or no
>>> bandwidth limitation. I have several clients connecting on LAN and at most
>>> if one gets lagged behind that is that (a low end machine that has to cope
>>> with the bandwidth but it does not affect the rest). Now the weird part. I
>>> told a friend of mine to connect from the other side of the globe and all
>>> of a sudden both of us are lagged. I see on the server that it gets updated
>>> and indeed generates the data as it should but now both of us are throttled
>>> to the very limited bandwidth of my friend even if my other client is on
>>> the LAN. I am sending with ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED so neither of us
>>> should be affected by the other (waiting for a packet to arrive). What
>>> gives? I tried it to someone geographically not far away and it was smooth.
>>>
>>> The packets are large and unreliable and broadcasted (tried it sending
>>> to individual peers but it did not change a thing).
>>>
>>> Confused,
>>>
>>> Pablo
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20150222/2ef8640a/attachment.html>