[ENet-discuss] Channel Incoming Unreliable Commands List Management Question

[Chris Jurney]

If you send 100 packets with 99% reliability, there is a 36% chance of
getting them all there.

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Alexander Dolgansky <alexd221 at gmail.com>wrote:

> That's a fair point but what bothers me about this somewhat is the
> fact that I was able to get these large messages before (perhaps they
> weren't 200 fragments long but definitely twice as large as the kind
> of messages that I can send now). Perhaps packet loss is more severe
> now but the last time I checked it was less than a percent (I don't
> know how accurate that measure was thought).
>
> Anyways, I'll experiment some more with what I can send unreliably
> with the updated ENet given my setup but as I mentioned before, the
> update did improve things so I am very happy about that.
>
> Alexander.
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20120801/906b635e/attachment.html>