[ENet-discuss] Bandwidth Monitoring?

[Andrew Fenn]

I believe it's already part of Enet 1.2.2

http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/2010-May/001434.html

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Nicholas J Ingrassellino
<nick at lifebloodnetworks.com> wrote:
> On the one hand I understand-- and love-- the idea of the minimalistic
> approach. Sure, it was designed for games, but if you want a lobby, or
> compression, or encryption, you have to implement it yourself. These are all
> high-level functions that keep ENet light on its feet and would be better
> implemented if trailered for a specific game. Bandwidth tracking, however, I
> feel would be best if part of the ENet API. If for no other reason than ENet
> can let us know about overhead in addition to the raw data being sent. Hell,
> it already reports latency.
>
> ________________________________
>
> Nicholas J Ingrassellino
> LifebloodNetworks.com || nick at lifebloodnetworks.com
>
> "The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve
> it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be
> legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years
> ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."
> - John Carmack on software patents
>
> On 10/21/2010 09:43 AM, Beau Albiston wrote:
>
> It would be nice to have some statistics functions.  I would be most
> interested in things like bytes/sec sent/received at the socket, for
> instance.
>
>
>
> -Beau
>
>
>
> From: enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org [mailto:enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org]
> On Behalf Of Nicholas J Ingrassellino
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 8:16 AM
> To: Discussion of the ENet library
> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Bandwidth Monitoring?
>
>
>
> Ooohhh, I misunderstood their purpose. Is there a variable somewhere that
> will tell me how much data is going back and forth at any given time or do I
> need to do that myself?
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Nicholas J Ingrassellino
> LifebloodNetworks.com || nick at lifebloodnetworks.com
>
> "The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve
> it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be
> legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years
> ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."
> - John Carmack on software patents
>
> On 10/20/2010 10:19 PM, Lee Salzman wrote:
>
> They're never updated and merely hold the values you pass in when you create
> the host.
>
> Lee
>
> On 10/19/2010 10:13 AM, Nicholas J Ingrassellino wrote:
>
> Is there something special I have to do to get _ENetPeer.incomingBandwidth
> and _ENetPeer.outgoingBandwidth working? I am using both reliable and
> unreliable packets but these values are always zero. For example, if I do
> std::cout << event.peer->incomingBandwidth; inside my main loop I get
> bumpkis. Also, how often are they updated?
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Nicholas J Ingrassellino
> LifebloodNetworks.com || nick at lifebloodnetworks.com
>
> "The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve
> it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be
> legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years
> ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."
> - John Carmack on software patents
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> ENet-discuss mailing list
>
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>