[ENet-discuss] My wish for ENET

[Brad Monahan]

Great ideas. Those are the only major drawbacks of ENET I think.




>From: "???" <weon at digitalwave.co.kr>
>Reply-To: Discussion of the ENet library <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
>To: "Discussion of the ENet library" <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
>Subject: [ENet-discuss] My wish for ENET Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:33:47 
>+0900
>
>While during my work in ehancing ENET, some consideration should be taken 
>in the next ENET release.
>1. memory handling
>	- ENET use a dynamic memory allocation scheme for incoming/outgoing packet 
>handling.
>	  This would be nice, but more sensitive against user bugs.
>	  I hope the amount of memory used by enet is fixed, as TCP in kernel 
>does.
>	  (I added pbuf list mechanism to ENET to handle packet header management 
>like mbuf in TCP,
>                but command list handling is, I think, another complex 
>issue. ;-)
>2. disconnection/recovery handling
>	- I added a simple recovery scheme by comparing challenge values.
>3  remote reset handling
>	- When one party of a communication pair is abnormally exited,
>	  the other party detects it somewhat long time after. I remember
>	  PING messages are used for this purpose, but RTT mechanism
>	  should be enhanced for faster detection, I think.
>
>All other things are great!
>
>I posted my modification history to Lee Saltzman already.
>I hope he also works for the issues above. ;-)
>
>-------
>won
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ENet-discuss mailing list
>ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss

_________________________________________________________________
Send a QuickGreet with MSN Messenger 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_games