[ENet-discuss] Does ENET make sure the reliable packet Sequencing in different channel?

[Eric]

Hi Lee Salzman,

I GOT IT

Thanks a lot!!

2016-08-26 10:08 GMT+08:00 Lee Salzman <lsalzman at gmail.com>:

> The ordering on different channels is completely independent. That is
> the point of them. If they were interlocked with respect to ordering,
> there would be no reason to have channels at all.
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Eric <shunxung+enet at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I know the ENet make sure the the order of reliable packet
> >
> > But how about the packet in different channel?
> >
> > sender:
> > send packet A in channel 0
> > send packet B in channel 1
> >
> > Dose receiver always receive A first and the B?
> >
> > if not, any suggestions about this problem?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eric
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ENet-discuss mailing list
> > ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20160826/9b39b258/attachment.html>