[ENet-discuss] timeout for attempting to send a reliable message

Yan Luo yanluo.uml at gmail.com
Sat Feb 11 15:04:07 PST 2012


Thanks for the reply. A follow up question, what is "default time-out
scheme" of ENet? How many times or how long does ENet try to resend an
undelivered reliable message?
 
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:41:46 +0200
>From: Lee Salzman <lsalzman at gmail.com>
>To: Discussion of the ENet library <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
>Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] timeout for attempting to send a reliable
>	message
>Message-ID: <4F35027A.3090208 at gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>ENet does not really have support for behavior like this built-in. All
>reliable packets follow the same time-out scheme, and if no ack ever gets
>received the connection is just... disconnected.
>
>You'd basically have to emulate it with unreliable packets and ack them
>on your end if you want some more application specific behavior.
>
>On 02/10/2012 06:13 PM, Yan Luo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to specify the attempt timeout for sending reliable
>> message? Here is the scenario:
>>
>> * message A needs to be sent reliably to host X.
>> * message A is sent by enet and the attempt continues until an ACK is
>> received from the destination node (that is what I understand how enet
>> would behave).
>> * However, in my application, message A becomes stale (or even
>> harmful) if it is in the sending host for over N milliseconds: there
>> is no need to keep sending it any more.
>>
>> How should I implement such a scenario?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for the help.
>>
>> Yan
>>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>ENet-discuss mailing list
>ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
>End of ENet-discuss Digest, Vol 105, Issue 1
>********************************************




More information about the ENet-discuss mailing list