[ENet-discuss] License question

[Nuno Silva]

When dealing with license text you must go literal with every single word.
It says you must include the copyright notice _and_ the permission notice
you are reading, so your approach is legally "incorrect". An easy way to
solve this would be to just include a text file with both notices in your
software package, e.g., "Enet.txt".

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Philip Bennefall <philip at blastbay.com>wrote:

>  Hi Lee,
>
> I just had a quick question for you regarding the ENet license, to make
> sure I am doing things correctly. With the following statement:
>
>
> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
> all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
>
>
>
> Do you refer to the source code, or must binary applications that use ENet
> include the license? Currently I have a statement like this in my
> documentation (including a link to the website):
>
>
>
> The ENet Project <http://enet.bespin.org/>
> ENet is a rock solid layer on top of the UDP protocol, optimized especially
> for high-speed games. This is what BGT uses to provide its networking
> capabilities.
>
> Is this acceptable? Or am I required to add the full legal text? I much
> prefer the above notice to the complete license.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Philip Bennefall
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20110325/cea706f5/attachment.html>