[ENet-discuss] CPU Usage

[Lee Salzman]

But that is sort of my point. The reason ENet is sucking is because you 
are bombarding it with a really silly amount of packets exactly because 
of how you are doing things. I would rather encourage you to use 
unreliable tiles of the screen that fit in 1KB unreliable packets, as 
anything else is going to cause symptoms you are observing, i.e. lots of 
CPU wastage crawling over huge packet lists.

Lee

On 09/26/2010 05:35 PM, Nicholas J Ingrassellino wrote:
> Blunt is good.
>
> My disclaimer in my first message was meant to pose this as an 
> experiment. This is a proof of concept kind of thing and nothing more. 
> The idea is to develop an alternative to sending hold frames (or only 
> the deltas). Much like VoIP does not suffer from some missing data I 
> want to do a little work on how much an image would suffer from the 
> smallest discrete unit (a pixel) missing unexpectedly. Look at my 
> experiment as anything other than academic-- or a what if-- and you 
> miss the point.
>
> *This is purely a exercise of the mind with a little code to back it up.*
>
> Compression and related topics will come later when I have the basics 
> figured out.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Nicholas J Ingrassellino
> LifebloodNetworks.com <http://www.lifebloodnetworks.com/> || 
> nick at lifebloodnetworks.com <mailto:nick at lifebloodnetworks.com>
>
> "The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically 
> solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could 
> not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical 
> steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."
> - John Carmack on software patents
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20100926/3d6f2b33/attachment-0001.html>