[ENet-discuss] Packet loss, unreliable packets

[Ruud van Gaal]

Hm, if the unreliable messages are important, and you're sending updated
packets if not acknowledged, it sounds like:
1. You're thinking they really ought to be reliable
2. You're handling them as unreliable, since you're resending with new
information anyway.
 
Why not skip checking ACK's, since you're not really using that anyway? And
just send out info every 0.5 seconds?
 
Not sure about the 6 secs delay; perhaps by default a reliable re-send
timeout is 5000 ms. Although if you get unack'd packets upon packets you
might overflow the pipe (but that won't happen quickly).
 
Cheers,
Ruud


  _____  

Van: enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org [mailto:enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org]
Namens Joel Anderson
Verzonden: Monday, May 25, 2009 07:13
Aan: enet-discuss at cubik.org
Onderwerp: [ENet-discuss] Packet loss, unreliable packets


Hi, 

I'm wondering if people can share there experiences with packet loss or
large delays in transmission they've had with enet and how they solved it?