[ENet-discuss] Channels and ordering

[Lee Salzman]

There are unreliable, unsequenced packets - just no reliable, 
unsequenced packets. You just use ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED. However, 
they use an entirely different bookkeeping scheme.

Lee

M. Rijks wrote:
> Ah, that makes perfect sense. Clever solution. Come to mention it, 
> that also somewhat clarifies the absence of unreliable unsequenced 
> packets in the model.
>
> Thank you for the detailed explanation, Lee.
>
> Martin