[ENet-discuss] 1.0 imminent - any requests?

[Scott Robinson]

That was intentional. Less confusion between documentation. Also, if I
remember, the old API had some functionality issues.

I'll checkout CVS later today and see if I have any newer patches to
include.

Scott.

* Rene Dudfield translated into ASCII [Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:54:39PM +1000][<3FEE53FF.3020706 at py3d.org>]
[snap]
> It seems the new pyenet uses a different api than the old one.  Seems ok 
> though.  The new api is more a close copy of enet c api.  Which makes 
> some things a little harder.  However not too hard as the enet c api is 
> quite easy :)

-- 
http://quadhome.com/            - Personal webpage
http://tranzoa.net/             - Corporate webpage
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20031230/4ffeb95c/attachment.pgp