I hate new DUB config format

[Chris via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 16:27:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 15:58:40 UTC, Chris wrote:
>>
>> Basically yes. But if it concerns "offical D" things should be 
>> synchronized better.
>
> Maybe defining what the inclusion process for "official D" is 
> and set down policies for decision making processes and quality 
> assurance for those projects that are included, then?

Yep. Something along these lines.

> But what D really needs is to complete the language spec and 
> clean up the core language.
>
> No other activity will matter in the long run, IMO.

DUB does matter, because it's the official package manager and is 
used by developers and will likely be used by newcomers too. It 
should offer as good a user experience as possible.