I hate new DUB config format

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 15:58:40 UTC, Chris wrote:
>
> Basically yes. But if it concerns "offical D" things should be 
> synchronized better.

Maybe defining what the inclusion process for "official D" is and 
set down policies for decision making processes and quality 
assurance for those projects that are included, then?

But what D really needs is to complete the language spec and 
clean up the core language.

No other activity will matter in the long run, IMO.