Just to be clear... if I set the unreliable packet fragmentation flag, and send a large unreliable packet that is broken in two, then only one of the two pieces arrives (first half or second half) before my next packet, enet will drop them on the floor rather than deliver me half the data, correct? That's what I'd expect, just wanted to make sure I understood.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Lee Salzman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lsalzman@gmail.com">lsalzman@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
It is possible that you will receive duplicate or out-of-order unreliable packets. I kind of never noticed the regression in Sauerbraten because it's unreliable packet usage was never actually triggered it or had noticeable effects even if it did.<div class="im">
<br>
<br>
On 05/31/2011 05:22 PM, Ruud van Gaal wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
It sounds important, but I'm not sure what you mean with 'regression in packet queing'. Is it important in every-day use, or is it an uncommon scenario?<br>
<br>
Ruud<br>
<br></div><div class="im">
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Philip Bennefall <<a href="mailto:philip@blastbay.com" target="_blank">philip@blastbay.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:philip@blastbay.com" target="_blank">philip@blastbay.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Thanks Lee, have downloaded this and will upgrade my engine. Aappreciate all the work you put into this library!<br>
<br>
Kind regards,<br>
<br>
Philip Bennefall<br></div>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee Salzman" <<a href="mailto:lsalzman@gmail.com" target="_blank">lsalzman@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:lsalzman@gmail.com" target="_blank">lsalzman@gmail.com</a>>><br>
To: "Discussion of the ENet library" <<a href="mailto:enet-discuss@cubik.org" target="_blank">enet-discuss@cubik.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:enet-discuss@cubik.org" target="_blank">enet-discuss@cubik.org</a>>><div class="im">
<br>
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:26 AM<br>
Subject: [ENet-discuss] ENet 1.3.2 and 1.2.4 released!<br>
<br>
<br>
While I was investigating how to do unreliable fragmenting, I came across a super silly regression in unreliable packet queuing. So this release is sort of a twofer, you get unreliable fragmenting option via ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNRELIABLE_FRAGMENT and the bug fix (so upgrading is recommended). No protocol breakage was done, so it is compatible.<br>
<br>
ENet 1.3.2 download link: <a href="http://enet.bespin.org/download/enet-1.3.2.tar.gz" target="_blank">http://enet.bespin.org/download/enet-1.3.2.tar.gz</a><br>
ENet 1.2.4 download link: <a href="http://enet.bespin.org/download/enet-1.2.4.tar.gz" target="_blank">http://enet.bespin.org/download/enet-1.2.4.tar.gz</a><br>
<br>
ChangeLog:<br>
<br>
ENet 1.3.2 (May 31, 2011):<br>
<br>
* added support for unreliable packet fragmenting via the packet flag<br>
ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNRELIABLE_FRAGMENT<br>
* fixed regression in unreliable packet queuing<br>
* added check against received port to limit some forms of IP-spoofing<br>
<br>
ENet 1.2.4 (May 31, 2011):<br>
<br>
* fixed regression in unreliable packet queuing<br>
* added check against received port to limit some forms of IP-spoofing<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ENet-discuss mailing list<br></div>
<a href="mailto:ENet-discuss@cubik.org" target="_blank">ENet-discuss@cubik.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ENet-discuss@cubik.org" target="_blank">ENet-discuss@cubik.org</a>><div class="im"><br>
<a href="http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ENet-discuss mailing list<br></div>
<a href="mailto:ENet-discuss@cubik.org" target="_blank">ENet-discuss@cubik.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ENet-discuss@cubik.org" target="_blank">ENet-discuss@cubik.org</a>><div class="im"><br>
<a href="http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ENet-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ENet-discuss@cubik.org" target="_blank">ENet-discuss@cubik.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss</a><br>
</div></blockquote><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ENet-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ENet-discuss@cubik.org" target="_blank">ENet-discuss@cubik.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>