[ENet-discuss] Any update soon to unsigned 32 bit bandwidth upper limit?

Pablo de Heras Ciechomski pablo.deheras at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 04:15:27 PST 2015


In that case nevermind :-) I thought 0 meant default.

Pablo

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Mokhtar Naamani <mokhtar.naamani at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Wouldn't setting the limit to 0 zero work?
> 0 means unlimited bandwidth.
>
> Mokhtar
> On 9 Feb 2015 00:18, "Pablo de Heras Ciechomski" <pablo.deheras at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Lee, and concerned
>>
>> Maybe I am too optimistic about internet speeds but seeing as we have a
>> lot of 300 Mbit connection and even 1Gbit connections popping up having the
>> bandwidth upper limit capped 4Gbyte/s or a 32Gbit connection, I know most
>> have only 1Gbit Ethernet. Would it soon time for Enet to upgrade to a 64bit
>> value for that parameter (I am thinking of enet_host_create)?
>>
>> Lets say if someone wanted to go wild on some really fast experimental
>> networks and just to be future proof.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Pablo
>>
>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> Pablo de Heras Ciechomski, PhD, founder
>> www.sciencevisuals.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ENet-discuss mailing list
>> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20150209/fead3f94/attachment.html>


More information about the ENet-discuss mailing list