[ENet-discuss] ENet 2.0 most wanted features?

[Benoit Germain]

I have used for a little while a streaming facility that can transfer large
amount of stuff. It is based on the latest ENet version and doesn't break
protocol; it's more like a high level service. I can share if you are
interested (and maybe this could be included in the official distro :-)


2013/4/30 Nuno Silva <little.coding.fox at gmail.com>

> It would be interesting if there was a standard way to transfer large
> amounts of data over ENet. Some of us might need to e.g., do video
> streaming, but the way to transfer the data might not be ideal or the best
> unless we're quite good at networking already (which I am not). I don't
> know if this would be a good idea, but I just wanted you to at least
> consider it.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Lee Salzman <lsalzman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So, I'm just thinking in the back of my mind what sort of things would be
>> desired in a hypothetical version 2.0 of ENet that broke API compatibility
>> and so could do things that would otherwise not be possible in a 1.x
>> release.
>>
>> That doesn't mean that a 2.0 is in the near future, but I'd like to get a
>> dialogue going about it.
>>
>> Aside from IPv6 support, are there any other big things people would want
>> that are none-the-less realistic and not overly complicated?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ENet-discuss mailing list
>> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>


-- 
Benoit.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20130430/3a2c227a/attachment.html>