[ENet-discuss] Specification

[Tommi S.e. Laukkanen]

Hi

Would it be possible that one of the ENET developers would write description document of the enet in wire protocol and algorithms involved so ENET could be proposed as a protocol and implementation library to standards?

Best regards,
Tommi Laukkanen

On 21.10.2010, at 17.46, Beau Albiston <BAlbiston at totimm.com> wrote:

> Sweet, didn’t see that.  Thanks!  Oh, and for those that are new to this networking stuff, take a look at WireShark.
> 
>  
> 
> From: enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org [mailto:enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org] On Behalf Of Lee Salzman
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 10:03 AM
> To: Discussion of the ENet library
> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Bandwidth Monitoring?
> 
>  
> 
> As per the 1.2.2 ChangeLog:
> "* added totalSentData, totalSentPackets, totalReceivedData, and
> totalReceivedPackets counters inside ENetHost for getting usage
> statistics"
> 
> They incremental continuously, so it's your job to reset them every second.
> 
> Lee
> 
> 
> On 10/21/2010 06:43 AM, Beau Albiston wrote:
> 
> It would be nice to have some statistics functions.  I would be most interested in things like bytes/sec sent/received at the socket, for instance.
> 
>  
> 
> -Beau
> 
>  
> 
> From: enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org [mailto:enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas J Ingrassellino
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 8:16 AM
> To: Discussion of the ENet library
> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Bandwidth Monitoring?
> 
>  
> 
> Ooohhh, I misunderstood their purpose. Is there a variable somewhere that will tell me how much data is going back and forth at any given time or do I need to do that myself?
> 
>  
> 
> Nicholas J Ingrassellino
> LifebloodNetworks.com || nick at lifebloodnetworks.com
> 
> "The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."
> - John Carmack on software patents
> 
> 
> On 10/20/2010 10:19 PM, Lee Salzman wrote:
> 
> They're never updated and merely hold the values you pass in when you create the host.
> 
> Lee
> 
> On 10/19/2010 10:13 AM, Nicholas J Ingrassellino wrote:
> 
> Is there something special I have to do to get _ENetPeer.incomingBandwidth and _ENetPeer.outgoingBandwidth working? I am using both reliable and unreliable packets but these values are always zero. For example, if I do std::cout << event.peer->incomingBandwidth; inside my main loop I get bumpkis. Also, how often are they updated?
> 
>  
> 
> Nicholas J Ingrassellino
> LifebloodNetworks.com || nick at lifebloodnetworks.com
> 
> "The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."
> - John Carmack on software patents
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>   
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>   
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20101024/0bc143f4/attachment.html>