[ENet-discuss] piggyback on connect
zslist at gmail.com
Wed Mar 31 10:36:11 PDT 2010
I can. In fact, that's what I'm doing. But I don't want to incur another
send, hence the piggybacking question.
Another unrelated question is the following:
I have 2 servers, I want to establish only one connection between the two.
Right now, I have to essentially make sure that only one initiate the
connection. That implies that I have to have separate logic for the server
that initiate the connection. But these are really the same servers, is
there a simple way guarantee only establish one connection between the two
when I allow each each server to attempt to connect to the other?
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Jay Sprenkle <jsprenkle at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why don't you send a packet to identify the process that is connecting?
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:00 AM, benchmark <zslist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> is there a way to piggyback some data (an 16bytes server id) on connect,
>> so that the target knows who has connected? I want to pass the client's id
>> to the server, in addition to its host/ip that's part of the peer info.
> I couldn't have said it better myself:
> "Hitler and cloud computing"
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ENet-discuss