[ENet-discuss] Pre-release feedback?

[Lee Salzman]

That is the way to do it. Just make sure not to leave events sitting 
there forever as that can leave the peers in a zombie state, waiting to 
notify the user of their status.

Lee

Philip Bennefall wrote:
> Looking at the enet_host_service function implementation it seems as 
> though just passing null to the function will do what I'm after, but 
> are there any side effects to doing this or will the rest of the 
> functionality, other than receiving events, work as expected (e.g. 
> keep buffering events until a valid event pointer is given in a call)?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Philip Bennefall
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip Bennefall" 
> <philip at u7142039.fsdata.se>
> To: "Discussion of the ENet library" <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 6:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Pre-release feedback?
>
>
> Hi again,
>
> One function that would be very useful to me at this point would be 
> one that
> you can poll to keep the connection alive (e.g. perform pings and 
> calculate
> roundtrips etc), without receiving events. In my scripting engine I 
> wish to
> poll ENet continuously in the background to keep the connection stats
> accurate, but only give events to users when they request them. Will the
> flush function do this? In short, the equivalent of host_service but 
> without
> receiving any events. Is this doable?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Philip Bennefall
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee Salzman" <lsalzman1 at cox.net>
> To: "Discussion of the ENet library" <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 1:54 PM
> Subject: [ENet-discuss] Pre-release feedback?
>
>
> For those who have tried the 1.2.2 and 1.3.0 pre-releases, did anyone
> find any issues with them, or have any last minute requests?
>
> I weeded out one bug during internal testing related to sending of
> fragmented packets, and I managed to squeeze out some better compression
> out of the range coder, but otherwise they seemed fairly stable to me.
> So if no one's got any objections I'll be releasing these two in the
> next couple of days.
>
> Lee
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
>
>
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2662 - Release Date: 02/01/10
> 12:37:00
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
>
>
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2662 - Release Date: 
> 02/01/10 12:37:00
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>