[ENet-discuss] ENetPeer structure when reconnecting

Daniel Aquino mr.danielaquino at gmail.com
Fri Jun 19 08:48:55 PDT 2009


I think I counted it some where around 30 seconds... you should just
test it out...

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Marc Rochel<marc.rochel at udicom.de> wrote:
> Really? How long is the timeout value in that case?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org [mailto:enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Aquino
> Sent: Freitag, 19. Juni 2009 15:31
> To: Discussion of the ENet library
> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] ENetPeer structure when reconnecting
>
> actually you do receive an event disconnect when enet gives up connecting...
>
> When i receive a disconnect message I have the information I need in
> peer->data to relate it back...
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:01 AM, William Brandt<taekvideo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Marc Rochel wrote:
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>>
>>
>> Something related was bugging me some time as well. When you try to connect,
>> after a while, if successful, you get a ENET_EVENT_TYPE_CONNECT, but you
>> never get a notification when the connection doesn't get established. Maybe
>> enet keeps trying infinitly itself? I "solved" the issue for me by checking
>> if some selfdefined timeout is passed and the call enet_host_destroy.
>> Creating a new one afterwards and trying to connect again works.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>     Marc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org [mailto:enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org]
>> On Behalf Of William Brandt
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2009 19:08
>> To: Discussion of the ENet library
>> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] ENetPeer structure when reconnecting
>>
>>
>>
>> Ruud van Gaal wrote:
>>
>> This all sounds familiar. I have this connection scheme with the following
>>
>> properties:
>>
>> - the server may not be online yet
>>
>> - the client attempts a connection every second or 2, to see if the server
>>
>> is already alive
>>
>> - I only want 1 connection (client<->server)
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a C++ wrapper (class QNClient) which only tracks 1 peer. This client
>>
>> class is legacy and only represents 1 link to a server (class QNServer).
>>
>> For repeated connection attempts, this was no problem in the past (without
>>
>> ENet); I sent out some kind of CONNECT packet, and if something came back,
>>
>> it was connected.
>>
>> With the ENet peer, I start an enet_host_connect() with every connection
>>
>> attempt. If I create an ENet host with only 1 peer, I run out of peers after
>>
>> this first connect attempt.
>>
>> It's a bit awkward, since if I allow more peers in the ENet host, multiple
>>
>> peers may connect succesfully. I'll have to drop the surplus of connections
>>
>> once the server comes up and it turns out I get multiple
>>
>> ENET_EVENT_TYPE_CONNECT events.
>>
>> It seems to work though with 1 peer, I just get a lot of 'out of peer' error
>>
>> when trying enet_host_connect(). I haven't tried resetting the peer; I don't
>>
>> think I want to since a connect reply may still be incoming and I'd rather
>>
>> handle that as usual.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ruud
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>
>> Van: enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org
>>
>> [mailto:enet-discuss-bounces at cubik.org] Namens Daniel Aquino
>>
>> Verzonden: Thursday, June 18, 2009 18:13
>>
>> Aan: Discussion of the ENet library
>>
>> Onderwerp: Re: [ENet-discuss] ENetPeer structure when reconnecting
>>
>>
>>
>> Perhaps as I said you ran out of peers...  So until the
>>
>> callback stack was finished that peer wouldn't be free yet...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:23 PM, William
>>
>> Brandt<taekvideo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel Aquino wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >From what i know there is no deleting.  I believe enet
>>
>>
>>
>> will clean up
>>
>>
>>
>> the peer after it has told you about the event and you have had a
>>
>> chance to react.  And the connection function will return a
>>
>>
>>
>> new peer
>>
>>
>>
>> with no way to re-use the existing peer that I know of...
>>
>>
>>
>> Which does
>>
>>
>>
>> confuse me a bit in the case of attempting to make a new connection
>>
>> inside of the disconnection event when there is no more
>>
>>
>>
>> peers left...
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't know if in that case it would still consider that peer as
>>
>> valid resulting in the inability to form a new connection or if it
>>
>> would end up using that same peer destroying data inside of it that
>>
>> you may still need...  So I copied any data I needed from the peer
>>
>> object before making the new connection just in case...   I guess
>>
>> these questions could be solved easily by looking into the
>>
>>
>>
>> enet code
>>
>>
>>
>> or setting the peer count to 1 and doing some testing...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, William
>>
>>
>>
>> Brandt<taekvideo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> When a user is disconnected from the server and is
>>
>>
>>
>> reconnecting, do I
>>
>>
>>
>> need to get a new ENetPeer object (from the enet_host_connect()
>>
>> function), or is it possible to use the same one to
>>
>>
>>
>> reconnect?  Also,
>>
>>
>>
>> if I have to get a new one, do I need to delete the old one (& how)?
>>
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> well what I'm doing now seems to be working...
>>
>> the main problem I was having was that enet_host_connect() was
>>
>> returning NULL when I tried to reconnect.  It seems I had to
>>
>> explicitly call
>>
>> enet_peer_reset() on the old peer object before I reconnect
>>
>>
>>
>> and get a
>>
>>
>>
>> new peer object.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> ENet-discuss mailing list
>>
>> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>>
>> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You should add a 5000ms delay when you call enet_host_service() to check for
>> connect events after calling enet_host_connect().  Then if you don't get a
>> response you can safely assume that the server isn't going to respond and
>> reset the peer then try again.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> ENet-discuss mailing list
>> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>>
>>
>> you can do that in one line.  It's safe to assume that you won't get any
>> events other than a connection confirmation if you're not connected... so
>> you can use the enet_host_service() built-in timeout feature.  This is what
>> I use (in a connect() function that returns true when connection succeeded
>> or false when it failed):
>>
>> peer_ = enet_host_connect (client_, &address, 2);
>> if (peer_ == NULL) throw "ERROR: Unable to initiate Enet peer connection.";
>> if (enet_host_service (client_, &event, 5000) > 0 && event.type ==
>> ENET_EVENT_TYPE_CONNECT) return true;
>> else{
>>         enet_peer_reset (peer_);
>>         return false;
>> }
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ENet-discuss mailing list
>> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
>> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>


More information about the ENet-discuss mailing list