[ENet-discuss] Has anyone seen this before?

[Ruud van Gaal]

I can attest that ENet seems to work marvelously.
I'm doing hundreds of packets a second on multiple machines (around 18 in a
current project) and have seen no memory growth.
However, you may experience such a thing if you don't read all packets each
time you handle the network. If you don't eat all of them, surely things
will get out of hand. I've seen that happen at one time, but it was a fault
in my code, not ENet's.

I only see packets lying around when I suddenly quit and some packets
probably are still incoming. But that's just a packet or 2 upon thousands
already delivered before that.

No problems here thus...

Cheers,
Ruud

> From: Lee Salzman <lsalzman1 at cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Has anyone seen this before?
> To: steve at stamm.com, Discussion of the ENet library
> 	<enet-discuss at cubik.org>
> Message-ID: <47D9EA28.1040805 at cox.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> Are you making sure to free the packets that you are 
> receiving? As for page faults, I would really think that is 
> coming from somewhere in your app, unless you are using ENet 
> in a way that is truly out of the ordinary and exploiting 
> some untested code path (unlikely).
> 
> Otherwise, I can't say there have been any memory leaks or 
> instability related to ENet really. Keep in mind I have been 
> running FPS games over it for 6 (almost
> 7?) years now
> without problems. So it should be, given proper usage, rock solid.
> 
> Lee
> 
> steve at stamm.com wrote:
> >
> > eNet is an absolutely fantastic library. Thanks Lee for the great 
> > piece of work!
> >
> >  
> >
> > In our eNet enabled app we are experiencing a situation 
> where the CPU 
> > usage and Memory allocated climb steadily over time. I have also 
> > noticed a high number of ?Page Faults? associated with the 
> run and was 
> > wondering if anyone has had a similar experience. I am not ready to 
> > attribute this to eNet but just wanted to see if this might 
> be a known 
> > issue.
> >
> >  
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >  
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ENet-discuss mailing list
> > ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
> >   
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
> 
> 
> End of ENet-discuss Digest, Vol 58, Issue 5
> *******************************************
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. 
> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1330 - Release 
> Date: 15/03/2008 14:36
>  
> 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1330 - Release Date: 15/03/2008
14:36