[ENet-discuss] Problem with sending packets of certain sizes (near MTU)
Lee Salzman
lsalzman1 at cox.net
Sun Sep 23 12:34:38 PDT 2007
Are you using version 1.1 of ENet?
Lee
Steffen Kolodziej wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm using enet - which I like a lot - with a basic-like programming
> language called BlitzMax. BlitzMax is somewhat able to interface with
> C/C++-code, but not quite smoothly. I had to write my own wrapper to
> make use of it. Therefore my error may be caused by other factors than
> enet, but I have no idea where else to post it.
> Whenever I send (reliable, not checked for unreliable) packets with a
> size of more than 1356 bytes, they don't get to the recipient as well as
> any other packets sent in the same direction after it. Sending packets
> in the other direction still works and the connection is not noted to be
> dead by enet.
> Looked like a MTU issue to me, but when i tried to send packets with
> significantly larger sizes (~2500 bytes) they worked perfectly, so
> packet fragmenting seems to work at least partly. Checking the MTU from
> my PC to the server via Ping in the console returned 1492 or 1500 (???)
> - not sure which one is right, but they're both quite a bit larger than
> enet's standard MTU of 1400 or the packet size at which i encountered
> the problem. I tried to change the server's enet's MTU, but it didn't
> help either. I'm not sure if i really changed it, though, because
> accessing the enet host's data fields is quite complicated through BlitzMax.
> I guess the problem is caused by my configuration in some way, and not
> by enet, but i have no idea how to debug it and hope for some clues by a
> enet expert.
>
> Thank you for the otherwise great network library.
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
More information about the ENet-discuss
mailing list