[ENet-discuss] ordered packets

[Luis Cabellos]

No need to apologize, my first post wasn't clear enought either  :-D

Paul Collier wrote:

>Sorry, I shouldn't have sent my question as a reply to your message,
>as I was asking about other details of the library implementation, and
>wasn't relating it at all to your implementation of unordered reliable
>packets. I'm sorry making you explain for nothing; that's my fault for
>not being clear enough. Cheers anyways!
>
>- Paul
>  
>