[ENet-discuss] ordered packets

[Paul Collier]

Yeah, to add to that, you only get unordered packets if you specify
ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED or something. Just wondering... doesn't
enet send all of the reliable packets even if the previous ack wasn't
received? I was under the impression that packets that arrive too
early are simply dropped instead, i.e. ordering is done at the
receiving end. I'm not too sure though.

- Paul

On 3/29/06, Tibor Klajnscek <tibor.klajnscek at gmail.com> wrote:
>  Yes, as far as I know it should. It is the way enet works - it won't send
> another reliable packet until the previous one gets through. Assuming you
> send them on the same channel of course.
>
>  - Tibor
>
>
>  siquan at ms16.hinet.net wrote:
>
>
>  If the server send packets with ENET_PACKET_FLAG_RELIABLE,
>  the client will receive them by order?
>
>  Best regards,
>  Si-Quan
>
>
>    ¡¶©IHiNet WebMail Internet ƒžà]Éú»î ×î¼Ñßx“ñ ¡·
> ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
>
>