[ENet-discuss] ordered packets

Luis Cabellos lists at tragnarion.com
Mon Apr 3 00:41:58 PDT 2006

That's the main reason. Also, when I implement the range of channels 

Thanks, Luis | Tragnarion

Bjørn Lindeijer wrote:

>Hello Tibor,
>The documentation about ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED says: "packet
>will not be sequenced with other packets not supported for reliable
>packets". I think they use multiple channels because what they're
>looking for is unsequenced but reliable packet delivery.
>On 3/31/06, Tibor Klajnscek <tibor.klajnscek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why don't you guys just use ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED for unordered
>>packet delivery
>> without using so many channels? Just wondering if i'm doing something wrong

More information about the ENet-discuss mailing list