[ENet-discuss] ordered packets

[Luis Cabellos]

That's the main reason. Also, when I implement the range of channels 
ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED wasn't in Enet.

Thanks, Luis | Tragnarion

Bjørn Lindeijer wrote:

>Hello Tibor,
>
>The documentation about ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED says: "packet
>will not be sequenced with other packets not supported for reliable
>packets". I think they use multiple channels because what they're
>looking for is unsequenced but reliable packet delivery.
>
>Regards,
>Bjørn
>
>On 3/31/06, Tibor Klajnscek <tibor.klajnscek at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>> Why don't you guys just use ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED for unordered
>>packet delivery
>> without using so many channels? Just wondering if i'm doing something wrong
>>:)
>>    
>>