[ENet-discuss] ordered packets
lists at tragnarion.com
Mon Apr 3 00:41:58 PDT 2006
That's the main reason. Also, when I implement the range of channels
ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED wasn't in Enet.
Thanks, Luis | Tragnarion
Bjørn Lindeijer wrote:
>The documentation about ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED says: "packet
>will not be sequenced with other packets not supported for reliable
>packets". I think they use multiple channels because what they're
>looking for is unsequenced but reliable packet delivery.
>On 3/31/06, Tibor Klajnscek <tibor.klajnscek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why don't you guys just use ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED for unordered
>> without using so many channels? Just wondering if i'm doing something wrong
More information about the ENet-discuss