[ENet-discuss] Stronger UDP checksum?

[Lee Salzman]

Send me a patch for it, and I will make it a compile time option.

Lee

Kevin Wasserman wrote:

> I’ve got a user who seems to occasionally (every
>
> 5 minutes or so, which is frequently enough) transmit
>
> a packet that becomes corrupted but apparently
>
> passes the UDP checksum and then naturally
>
> wreaks havok on my app. I was wondering if
>
> anyone else had had a similar exerience and
>
> thinking that I might add an option to enet to
>
> provide a stronger checksum (e.g. CRC32) when
>
> sending a packet. For reliable packets, particularly,
>
> I think it makes sense to do it in enet rather than
>
> at a higher level. Any thoughts?
>
> -Kevin Wasserman
>
>  
>