Three people out of four dislike SDL
Saurabh Das via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Nov 30 20:38:57 PST 2015
On Monday, 30 November 2015 at 22:59:04 UTC, retard wrote:
> Just voted at
> http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=565587f4e4b0b3955a59fb67 -
> 140 votes, 75% are against SDL. That should count for
> something? Sonke?
As Sonke had pointed out in the other thread, there was a long
process before SDL was adopted and the community was kept
informed of it all through. I think everybody in this community
had plenty of time and enough number of opportunities to object
to SDL if they had any issues with it. See
http://forum.dlang.org/post/n36gvd$1lia$1@digitalmars.com
It's unfair to criticise SDL at this point after it's been
implemented when there was ample opportunity to object earlier.
It's not a Douglas Adamsesque "notes were kept in a basement and
accessible only after flipping a dice" scenario - in this case,
requests for comments were posted in this very forum, on GitHub
and elsewhere.
Given that JSON is always going to be supported, just use JSON if
you are so uncomfortable with SDL.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list