Collections question
Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Nov 29 12:01:02 PST 2015
On Sunday, 29 November 2015 at 15:06:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> Thanks all. I'll go with the factory function. -- Andrei
As Timon suggested, I'd encourage you to go for a free factory
function named after the container like RedBlackTree does with
redBlackTree rather than having a static factory function, since
it's less verbose and allows for type inference, though there's
no reason why we couldn't have both:
auto c1 = MyCollection!int.make(1, 2, 3);
auto c2 = myCollection!int(1, 2, 3);
auto c3 = myCollection(1, 2, 3);
Regardless, it's better to avoid static opCall.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list