I hate new DUB config format

[UserAbcabc123 via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 29 November 2015 at 16:07:05 UTC, UserAbcabc123 wrote:
> On Sunday, 29 November 2015 at 06:03:21 UTC, Poyeyo wrote:
>> On Saturday, 28 November 2015 at 23:38:35 UTC, UserAbcabc123 
>> wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 28 November 2015 at 22:00:32 UTC, Poyeyo wrote:
>>>> Dubconf seems to me a good replacement name for the format.
>>>
>>> Hilarous, I guess you didn't read the topic at all...
>>
>> I've read it all. But I'm not joining the group in arguing 
>> against the format. And yes, someone said .dubconf should be 
>> an analog for.
>
> DUB people can't change the format name. They are not the SDL 
> authors.
> This is what I find hilarous because let's say 12 pages before 
> there's been a misunderstanding caused by the fact that some 
> people thought the format is propietary, thus DUB people have 
> have been unfairly blamed...
>
> The whole discussion is not about the file extention. The File 
> extention is not a problem at all, the discussion was more 
> about the format itself.

By the way, I'm curious to see if A.D.Ruppe will summarize the 
whole topic in the "signifiant NG discussion" section in the next 
"this week in D" issue...

I you do so, good luck !