Collections question

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 28 November 2015 at 06:26:03 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 20:25:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe 
> wrote:
>> That syntax is the same as constructors... if that's what you 
>> want it to look like, we ought to actually use a constructor 
>> for all but the zero-argument ones which I'd use a static 
>> named function for (perhaps .make or perhaps .makeEmpty too)
>
> While I think this would be nice and explicit, it's bad for 
> generic code, which would have to specialize to correctly call 
> the nullary version.

Well... doesn't work: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/2c69cc3584b8