I hate new DUB config format
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Nov 26 23:15:52 PST 2015
On 2015-11-26 23:38, BLM768 wrote:
> That was actually one of my first thoughts. It would be pretty, but we'd
> have another dependency then. Also, Ruby doesn't embed well into other
> applications
I has worked fine for me.
> and if we're using another general-purpose programming
> language for our config format, what kind of impression does that give
> others about our confidence in D?
This is (one of the reasons) why people complain. The problem with D is
that it won't be pretty.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list