I hate new DUB config format

[Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d]

On 26/11/2015 12:53, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> V Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:43:52 +0000
> Chris via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> napsáno:
>
>> On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:29:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
>> wrote:
>>> On 2015-11-25 11:17, Suliman wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> BTW, why was not TOML [1] chosen? I know it was discussed but I
>>> can't remember why SDL was preferred. I think TOML is more
>>> widely used than SDL [2]. GitLib CI multi runner is also using
>>> it.
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml
>>> [2] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml#projects-using-toml
>>
>> TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to
>> maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.
>
> Ok, but we can afford to mantain a parser for a dead format?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simple_Declarative_Language
>

BAM!! *Daniel drops mike, walks way*


(well said)

-- 
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros