I hate new DUB config format

[Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:43:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:29:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
> wrote:
>> On 2015-11-25 11:17, Suliman wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> BTW, why was not TOML [1] chosen? I know it was discussed but 
>> I can't remember why SDL was preferred. I think TOML is more 
>> widely used than SDL [2]. GitLib CI multi runner is also using 
>> it.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml
>> [2] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml#projects-using-toml
>
> TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to 
> maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.

If it's good enough for Rust, it's good enough for us.