I hate new DUB config format

[Suliman via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 13:10:30 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
Grøstad wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:43:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
>> TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to 
>> maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.
>
> Why not use a well defined subset of YAML then?

I really think that small subset of YAML would be very good 
solution. It's easy to read and easy to write. DUB do not have 
full implement it. Just some basic things.

TOML is harder to read, and write bu hands.