I hate new DUB config format

[Chris via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:29:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> On 2015-11-25 11:17, Suliman wrote:
>> [...]
>
> BTW, why was not TOML [1] chosen? I know it was discussed but I 
> can't remember why SDL was preferred. I think TOML is more 
> widely used than SDL [2]. GitLib CI multi runner is also using 
> it.
>
> [1] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml
> [2] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml#projects-using-toml

TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to 
maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.