Scott Meyers wants to bring default zero-initialization to C++, mentions TDPL for precedent
Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Nov 18 23:11:40 PST 2015
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 21:08:38 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
> Is it really though? In theory, yes. But in practice it's the
> same problem.
Not the same problem. In dynamic languages changes are caught at
runtime, not compile time.
When changes affect compile time only then you can give up
upgrading the code base and use a compatibility switch.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list