Formal Review of std.range.ndslice

[Ilya via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 18:40:40 UTC, Jack Stouffer 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 08:52:11 UTC, Robert burner 
> Schadek wrote:
>> [...]
>
> I know it's bad practice for regular Phobos code to import from 
> std.experimental, but what's the protocol for code inside 
> std.experimental importing other code in std.experimental? It 
> would be nice to get Andrei's opinion on this.
>
> Another problem with using std.experimental.allocator is it 
> ties the time table of this going into stable with 
> std.allocator. Worse case scenario, it could be a year before 
> std.allocator is stable, where as std.range.ndslice is much 
> simpler code and could be moved much faster.

Possible solutions:
1. Mark `makeSlice` with red "Experimental"
2. Move `makeSlice` to unittest, so user could copy-past it.