RFC in Comparison between Rust, D and Go

[Chris via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 11 November 2015 at 18:25:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Wednesday, 11 November 2015 at 12:22:24 UTC, Walter Bright 
> wrote:
>> On 11/9/2015 3:11 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>> Great post, though languages that compile to C (e.g. Nim) are 
>>> probably even
>>> better at interfacing with C/C++ than D. I'm sure D is #1 
>>> aside those though.
>>
>> I'd like to know of any language (other than C++ and O-C) that 
>> does a better job interfacing to C and C++. How does Nim do 
>> any part of it better?
>
> Nim does everything according to their marketing department. 
> The engineering department remains to be found.

Please elaborate. I'm all ears.