Our template emission strategy is broken

[David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 11 November 2015 at 17:19:51 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Please no.  I've done my fair share of investigating this in 
> libunwind, and it just isn't worth it.

It isn't worth it, or you couldn't figure out how to? ;P

In other words, what I'm asking is: Yes, all the lifetime 
management depends crucially on the C++ standard library 
internals. But given that we do this anyway (name mangling, 
etc.), how would you decide that the effort is not worth it?

  — David