RFC in Comparison between Rust, D and Go

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 11/9/2015 11:30 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> There is plenty wrong with it. For instance, he mention that C++ and D are not
> attractive coming from C because of the complexity, but somehow this doesn't
> apply to Rust. The claim is so ludicrous I have hard time to believe that one
> can make it seriously.
>
> Rust is way more complex than C. It's not even close.

Sometimes being very close to something internalizes the complexity to the point 
where you don't see it anymore. I've had some C++ people tell me they did not 
really see the complexity of C++ until after they'd used D for a while.