RFC in Comparison between Rust, D and Go

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Nov 9 16:43:48 PST 2015


On 11/09/2015 06:18 PM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 21:01:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 11/09/2015 09:13 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
>>> Yet another shallow language comparison that needs to be corrected:
>>>
>>> https://www.quora.com/Which-language-has-the-brightest-future-in-replacement-of-C-between-D-Go-and-Rust-And-Why/answer/Matej-%C4%BDach?srid=itC4&share=1
>>>
>>
>> My response: https://goo.gl/VTEYFk -- Andrei
>
> One correction - AFAIK Rust also does have native C interop via
> https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ffi.html
> Convenience / syntax / style aside actual capabilities seem to be on
> part with D.

I was aware of that, and convenience, syntax, and style are not to be 
discounted. -- Andrei


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list